Fiona and Grant are a couple married for about 45 years. The story is told mostly from the perspective of Grant. Fiona starts suffering from memory loss, which seems like Alzheimer, though it is not explicitly mentioned. The onset and seriousness of memory loss is not referred explicitly, but more through a series of events/actions like
Over a year ago, Grant had started noticing so many little yellow notes stuck up all over the house. That was not entirely new. Fiona had always written things down—the title of a book she’d heard mentioned on the radio or the jobs she wanted to make sure she got done that day. Even her morning schedule was written down. He found it mystifying and touching in its precision: “7 a.m. yoga. 7:30–7:45 teeth face hair. 7:45– 8:15 walk. 8:15 Grant and breakfast.”
The new notes were different. Stuck onto the kitchen drawers—Cutlery, Dishtowels, Knives. Couldn’t she just open the drawers and see what was inside?
But things come to a pass, where Fiona has to be taken to a place 'Meadowlake' which apparently looks after people with similar affliction. Grant comes back after leaving her there. He is to visit her after a week. He is worried about her and phones everyday and talks to the nurse Kristy about Fiona. Grant has been a lecturer/professor at a college. He has also had quite a few affairs. It is hinted that he had to resign from his position due to some hushed up scandal where he was accused of using his position to get one his students to bed. Munro is a master in describing entire life times in a few paragraphs, but why this description about Grant's affair. The answer could be present, as we read through the story. It is hinted that even with his affairs, he did not even think of leaving Fiona, does it mean he loved her and if so why the affairs?And of deceiving Fiona—as, of course, he had. But would it have been better if he had done as others had done with their wives, and left her? He had never thought of such a thing. He had never stopped making love to Fiona.
Grant visits Fiona after a week. She is not in her room, the nurse takes him to a hall where there are several inmates present along with Fiona. They are playing cards and Fiona is sitting next to a person who is also in the game. Fiona sees Grants and greets him. He introduces her new friend, whom she says she used to know when they were kids.
The other man is Aubrey and about Grant's age But he seems to resent Grants intrusion here. In Munro's words
the cardplayer was sending her his look, which was one not of supplication but of command. ... Fiona too seems to have become close him, when she says “I better go back,” Fiona said, a blush spotting her newly fattened face. “He thinks he can’t play without me sitting there. It’s silly, I hardly know the game anymore...' Fiona goes back to the game leaving Grant. He goes back to the Nurse. His reaction to what has happened is pithily put in the question he asks the nurse 'Grant said, “Does she even know who I am?”. The nurse tries to brush it off saying that it is normal to people here for form new attachments and it would probably go off after sometime. But things don't change, Fiona is most of the time with Aubrey and seems to drift apart from Grant. The story can very well end here and it would still be a good one, with Grant being left alone and the reader ruminating on the myriad ways in which humans can behave. But Munro is one who pushes the envelope always.
One day when Grant visits here, he finds here in bed and pretty upset. Aubrey is with her holding hands. It transpires.that Aubrey is to be discharged. Completely unaware of what she is saying, Fiona asks Grant if he any influence to keep Aubrey here. Aubrey too does not seem to want to leave. Fiona holds him in her arms, comforting him and 'there was nothing Grant could decently do but get out of the room.". The irony of this is wrenching. Fiona's condition deteriorates after Aubrey leaves, she rarely leaves her bed and becomes almost immobile. She is in danger to moving to a ward where the more seriously afflicted are kept.
Grant then goes to meet Aubrey's wife Marian. Marian is initially bit hostile to him as she is upset about her husband's new relationship with Grant's wife. Gradually she thaws. Grant asks Marian if if Aubrey could visit Fiona once in a week. He offers to take Aubrey himself to the center. Marian refuses, saying that what could be passing fancy could become more permanent. She also says that she would keep Aubrey at her home itself. Grant praises here noble intentions. But Munro is not satisfied with that. She peels layer after layer of the human mind and behavior and lets us see what lies underneath each layer. This great gift of hers could actually be a failing, since the reader gets an impression that there is almost no true empathy anywhere in the world, when all actions are stripped to the bare. Consider Marian's response to Grant's praise.
“No, it isn’t. But the way I am, I don’t have much choice. I don’t have the money to put him in there unless I sell the house. The house is what we own outright. Otherwise I don’t have anything in the way of resources. Next year I’ll have his pension and my pension, but even so I couldn’t afford to keep him there and hang on to the house. And it means a lot to me, my house does.”
Sounds almost mercenary right, but who are we to judge others and their predicaments. Grant's leaves and comes back to his home. Even at this point, if the story ends, it is a good one, better than the one that ends with Fiona making friendship with Aubrey. But no, there are still layers of human behavior to be peeled. Grant has got 2 messages in this phone. Both are from Fiona. The first is
“Hello, Grant. I hope I got the right person. I just thought of something. There is a dance here in town at the Legion supposed to be for singles on Saturday night and I am on the lunch committee, which means I can bring a free guest. So I wondered whether you would happen to be interested in that? Call me back when you get a chance.”
The second message, which has come immediately after the first is
“I just realized I’d forgotten to say who it was. Well, you probably recognized the voice. It’s Marian. I’m still not so used to these machines. And I wanted to say I realize you’re not a single and I don’t mean it that way. I’m not either, but it doesn’t hurt to get out once in a while. If you are interested you can call me and if you are not you don’t need to bother. I just thought you might like the chance to get out. It’s Marian speaking. I guess I already said that. O.K. then. Goodbye.”
The greatness of Munro manifests in the above 2 paragraphs, which are so real. Lets consider the first one, Marian is asking Grant if he would come with her for a dance. Set aside the surprise/shock at this message from Marian who is pretty devoted to her husband and lets also set side thinking about what made her do this. Just the dialogue, short, abrupt, exactly just like someone who just wants to get something out and blurts it out without any context or reference. The second dialogue is even more insightful. This is what every done says/has said, after we have said/done something without much thinking and want to make up for it. Marian in this message, is bit defensive, unsure of what she wants to says and if she saying it the correct way and trying to mask it at the same time and trying to be bit flippant in saying that 'don't need to bother if you are not interested'.
How many times have we said variants of the same thing. Grant thinks for sometime and starts dialing her number.
Cut to the last part. Grant goes to the center. He tells Fiona '“Fiona, I’ve brought a surprise for you. Do you remember Aubrey?”. What has happened, did Grant and Marian hook up together, is that why Aubrey has come to visit Fiona, as some deal? Or is it just a simple rhetorical question? But
“Names elude me,” she said harshly. It seems she has forgotten Aubrey or has she? The story ends there with the following paragraphs
“I’m happy to see you,” she said, both sweetly and formally. She pinched his earlobes, hard.
“You could have just driven away,” she said. “Just driven away without a care in the world and forsook me. Forsooken me. Forsaken.”
He kept his face against her white hair, her pink scalp, her sweetly shaped skull.
He said, “Not a chance.”
Note
1. I did not then and don't do now, understand the rationale of the title of this story. If someone can enlighten me, would be grateful.
2. This story was made into a film, don't know if it released last year or is yet to release.
It came as movie in 2006 itself i feel.
ReplyDeleteA good review... Keep it up...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0491747/
Hello, I liked your analysis too much. Maybe it could help me for my final work. Uh, I didn't understand the title either, it's such a weird one that has no relation, as far as I read, with the story. Bye.
ReplyDeleteThanks Abbi. Hope the post helps you.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link to this story. I will read it soon and return to your post then
ReplyDeletehello. there's a popular nursery rhyme entitled" The Bear Came Over the Mountain" and I believe Munro used this to illustrate the twist in Grant's life- 'other side of things' - as the lyrics go:
ReplyDelete"the bear went over the mountain,
To see what he could see.
And all that he could see,
And all that he could see,
Was the other side of the mountain."
what do you think? =)
Oh, didn't know about this nursery rhyme. Yest, it does fit well with the story. Thanks
DeleteI liked your analysis. The movie is "Away From Her", and many of the dangling thoughts in Munro's book are filled in by Hollywood. I watched the preview apparently showing Grant and Marian connecting. I'm guessing Fiona and Aubrey also get back together. Why do you assume Grant doesn't love Fiona because of his affairs? After all, look at Hillary and Bill.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first Munro book I've read, what others come close to being this good? I'm also reading J.D. Salinger's Nine Stories (probably prompted by a Charlie Rose interview about a new movie about Salinger). The directness of the styles seem similar. By the way, the only understanding I can give to the title is that it is similar to a childhood ditty, and Fiona is reverting to her earlier days. Since the ditty is "the bear went over the mountain.. to see what he could see" perhaps we are the bears and the mountain is old age, and it's an adventure because we don't know what we will see. Rob
To me, 'Runaway' and 'Hateship, Friendship, Courtship, Loveship, Marriage' are her best works. Generally speaking, her works are always of a consistently high quality though the 2 collections I have referred above are a cut above the rest.
DeleteI liked your analysis. The movie is "Away From Her", and many of the dangling thoughts in Munro's book are filled in by Hollywood. I watched the preview apparently showing Grant and Marian connecting. I'm guessing Fiona and Aubrey also get back together. Why do you assume Grant doesn't love Fiona because of his affairs? After all, look at Hillary and Bill.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first Munro book I've read, what others come close to being this good? I'm also reading J.D. Salinger's Nine Stories (probably prompted by a Charlie Rose interview about a new movie about Salinger). The directness of the styles seem similar. By the way, the only understanding I can give to the title is that it is similar to a childhood ditty, and Fiona is reverting to her earlier days. Since the ditty is "the bear went over the mountain.. to see what he could see" perhaps we are the bears and the mountain is old age, and it's an adventure because we don't know what we will see. Rob
To me, 'Runaway' and 'Hateship, Friendship, Courtship, Loveship, Marriage' are her best works. Generally speaking, her works are always of a consistently high quality though the 2 collections I have referred above are a cut above the rest.
DeleteThe 2006 movie is "Away From Her" and cleans up some loose ends as only Hollywood can. From the preview it appears Grant and Marian connect, and probably Aubrey and Fiona get back together. Why do you question Grant's love for Fiona in the light of his affairs? Isn't this the age of Hillary and Bill, and not of hopeless romantics?
ReplyDeleteThe Bear Came Over the Mountain is close to the childhood ditty and Fiona is reverting. Also (perhaps a stretch) the ditty says "the bear went over the mountain... to see what he could see", so maybe we are the bears and the mountain is old age. When we come over the mountain it's such an adventure we don't know what we will see. Rob
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI just read the story twice, and for the record, I am an 82 year old Freudian psychoanalyst, and do some reading and writing. First of all, and I think this is important, the waiting period was one month, not one week, enough for Fiona to get attached to Aubrey and kind of brush off her husband at his first visit. He asks Kristy, does she know me? The attachment between the two old demented people at Meadowlake becomes quite intense and durable, so that when Aubrey's wife takes him home, Fiona falls into a depression. Grant, out of loving concern and/or guilt, tries to get Marian, the wife of Aubrey to at least visit Fiona once a week. Marian says these relationships come and go and besides, that would be too much trouble. Grant persists and tries to persuade Marian to put him back at Meadowlake permanently. She says she cannot afford it and certainly won't give up her house to pay for it, as the most important thing is money. Whoever thinks otherwise is delusional. Somehow at the end, Aubrey is back full time and at the meeting, it is clear that Marian and Grant are both free. I think Marian pinched Grant's ears hard, as she makes a play for him. So Fiona and Aubrey are back together in the institution, and Grand and Marian can look forward to a new and rewarding life together. It is certainly possible for Grant to love Fiona and still have affairs, and it is also possible, since Fiona doesn't know him anymore, to love Marian. If the unconscious is still working in dementia, which I think it is, Fiona's 'affair' with Aubrey is getting even. She must have resented his affairs. Love is ambivalent.
ReplyDeleteI wrote a rather detailed analysis and then lost it in the process of verifying my Google status. I will try to write it again. I thought it was important to state that I am an 82 year old Freudian psychoanalyst, not retired. I read the story twice after learning of Munro's Nobel Prize. I wanted to see what was a great short story, great literature. And certainly it was that. In this analysis the waiting period was mistakenly written as one week. It was actually one month. Kristy, the nurse, explained that the period of time gives a chance for the new occupant to get settled and acclimated, obviating emotional scenes and changing of the mind about being institutionalized. In this case, Fiona got acclimated all right, enough time to forget her husband, Grant, and develop what turns out to be a rather deep friendship with another demented inmate, Aubrey. Fast forward, Aubrey's wife, Marian, takes him home as she is short of money.
ReplyDeleteFiona falls into a depression and Grant is so concerned, that he appeals to Marian to at least let Aubrey visit once a week. Marian says that is too much trouble, and returning him full time, as Grant also suggests, is out of the question, as her house is the only thing she's got and she isn't going to give it up, and don't you know, money is the most important thing, and if you don't know that, you are out of your mind! In the end, Grant falls for Marian and pays for Aubrey's return. This is not mentioned in the story, but is strongly implied. So it's a happy ending after all, the two demented inmates have each other and now Grant and Marian are free to have each other. There is no doubt but that Grant loved Fiona, but he was a philanderer, no doubt about it. He was not going to leave his wife just for a few floozies along the way. In the end, Marian takes a liking to Grant and his generosity and money and she pinches his ears to let him know that she is still a hot number. Leave Marian? Not a chance!
I realize there is an alternative explanation of the ending:
ReplyDeleteGrant presents Fiona with a present, it is Aubrey. He convinced Marian to return Aubrey to Meadowlake for Fiona's pleasure and satisfaction. She says he had not forsaken her. He came back, but with Aubrey, Marian's demented husband. She is delighted and throws her arms around her husband and pinches his ears. She says you have not forsaken me. He says, "Not a chance." But I conclude what is unstated, that now that Fiona is happy with Aubrey, Marian and Grant are free to be with each other. Marian would not have returned Aubrey to Meadowlake unless Grant had come up with the money. Marian had said that money is all important. So she too is free of the burden of taking care of her husband, as Fiona and Aubrey have each other, and now Marian and Grant are free to have eachother. The multiple possible interpretations are the sign of great art, great literature, also the truth about life and the human condition. Either way, the outcome is thoroughly believable.
I see value in your assertion about how Fiona unconsciously condemns Grant for his infidelities. Although initially Grant was the person who has lewd affairs with household wives and young college students, eventually the role between Grant and Fiona is switched, where Fiona instead engages in these actions with Aubrey. As a result, the relationship between Aubrey and Fiona is a way for her to get back at Grant. Truly ironic.
DeleteSir, you need to reread the final scene. Marian does not pinch Grant's ears; she's not even present. It's Fiona doing the pinching. Also, there is absolutely no indication that Aubrey is back permanently. Grant explicitly states that he has brought Aubrey back for a "visit".
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting how we all filter fiction through the lens of what we want to see.
Gil,
ReplyDeleteThe ending is great, it allows everyone their own interpretation. To me, I think Fiona's dementia has deepened to a state she doesn't even remember neither Grant or Aubrey. So Grant just pretends he is Aubrey and it wouldn't matter to Fiona who is who at her state of illness.
Gil,
ReplyDeleteThe ending is great, it allows everyone their own interpretation. To me, I think Fiona's dementia has deepened to a state she doesn't even remember neither Grant or Aubrey. So Grant just pretends he is Aubrey and it wouldn't matter to Fiona who is who at her state of illness.
damn, I lost my comment.
ReplyDeleteThe ending is great and it allows everyone to have their own interpretation. To me, I think Grant is pretending he is Aubrey. At the late stage of dementia, Fiona only remembers she had loved Aubrey, but wouldn't remember Aubrey's face, so Grant just pretends he is Aubrey, and it wouldn't make a difference to Fiona who is who. Aubrey only exists in her mind as an idea, the actual person/being doesn't matter to her anymore.